• Welcome to Tekno RC Forums! Are you a Tekno RC fan? If so you're in luck as you've have arrived to the biggest and best Tekno RC community.

    Come join our community and ask your questions, show off your Tekno RCs and share your experience!

OG MT410 build 2025

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I have ordered orange springs as that would be more sensible with the added weight.

Drove it around a country park where there were some bumpy terrain. Comparing it to my Tekno mt410 2.0 it handles like an absolute beast and just absorbs everything. My 2.0 will roll over if I turn too much whereas the og just carries on.

Tempted to order some 6s packs and drop a 16t pinion in seems like a good combo with the 1520 castle motor.
 
I have ordered orange springs as that would be more sensible with the added weight.

Drove it around a country park where there were some bumpy terrain. Comparing it to my Tekno mt410 2.0 it handles like an absolute beast and just absorbs everything. My 2.0 will roll over if I turn too much whereas the og just carries on.

Tempted to order some 6s packs and drop a 16t pinion in seems like a good combo with the 1520 castle motor.
The short wheelbase is a lot to handle on 6s. The longer chassis (from the ET48.3) gives it much needed stability, but then becomes more of a speed basher.

I like the OG MT410 as is on 4s, turns on a dime, flips easy and stays manageable in a smaller backyard.

MT410 in two different flavors:
IMG_4203.webp
 
The short wheelbase is a lot to handle on 6s. The longer chassis (from the ET48.3) gives it much needed stability, but then becomes more of a speed basher.

I like the OG MT410 as is on 4s, turns on a dime, flips easy and stays manageable in a smaller backyard.

MT410 in two different flavors:
View attachment 10919
Nice looking cars.

Isnt running 6s on a 1615kv motor similar to running 4s with like a 23t pinion on the same motor?
 
View attachment 10909
View attachment 10910View attachment 10911





Changed shock fluid and used the new revised shock mounts. They reduce wear with the shock cap.
Awesome build. Just bought a like new MT410 locally 2 months ago. They are awesome trucks. The Oktay bumpers and wheelie bar are awesome and take a beating.
What are the part numbers to these standoffs?

Also, on the aluminum gear boxes, I saw that when they originally came out there was a tolerance issue where there was almost no play with the rear center driveshaft. Is that still an issue?
 
Awesome build. Just bought a like new MT410 locally 2 months ago. They are awesome trucks. The Oktay bumpers and wheelie bar are awesome and take a beating.
What are the part numbers to these standoffs?

Also, on the aluminum gear boxes, I saw that when they originally came out there was a tolerance issue where there was almost no play with the rear center driveshaft. Is that still an issue?

Thanks, enjoying it a lot smokes my MT410 2.0 wish i just got this straight away lol.​

Sorry took the picture with the labels around the other side​

TKR8727 -bushes​

TKR8730 - Stand offs​


I know what you mean about the ally gearboxes the only posts about them where when they first came out and it came with a sleeve unless you bought larger bearings. I bought large bearings ready for when they came but I didn't need to use them as they already had the large bearings fitted there was no removable sleeve.

As for the center driveshaft play, using a pair of needle nose pliers i can rock the shaft backwards and forward around 2-3mm hard to measure but there is movement.
 
Nice looking cars.

Isnt running 6s on a 1615kv motor similar to running 4s with like a 23t pinion on the same motor?
What you are referring to is the theoretical top speed that is function of voltage, kv, gears ratio.

The reality of 6s is that at equivalent battery cell, you have 1.5x more power than 4s. It’s going to be faster, will generate more heat and wear & tear.

There’s likely a way to create an efficient 6s system that slows things down and focuses on durability. But i’ve never seen anyone do that. It would probably start with a reasonably sized lower kv motor.
 
The thing is, power depends on voltage, but squared, so ideally you have 2.25 times the power available. And 1.5x top speed. In practice it will be less due to increased electrical and mechanical losses and resistances.
 
Back
Top