Kronuxx
Member
I currently have a SCT410.3. The thing is amazing. Durable, strong, fast, good control, although nose diving was an issue. My question is: Should I progress to the SCT410 2.0. I'm not sure if I should based on the reading, research, and comparisons I've been making. Then again, I don't have a SCT 2.0 in my hands to make a better educated decision. My concern is that the 2.0 just seems...smaller in terms of gears, shocks...and maybe durability wise? Also, I like how the 410.3 had a narrow chassis body, really allowed it to shoot like a dart across jumps. The 410 2.0 seems broader for it's chassis/bottom so I feel like parachuting would be a bigger issue with this sct compared to it's predecessor? I'm also not a fan of the locked motor mount compared to the sliding motor mount for the 410.3.
On the other hand, I do like the design of the chassis more on the 2.0. More room, symmetrical, and overall seems more aggressive if not in driving, at least in style.
I guess, what I'm trying to ask is: Is the 410 2.0 worth the purchase if I already have an sct 410.3 (I have pretty much most Tekno Upgrades on it)? Does it handle better? Is it just as durable as it's older brother? Anyone willing to give me a break down, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks.
On the other hand, I do like the design of the chassis more on the 2.0. More room, symmetrical, and overall seems more aggressive if not in driving, at least in style.
I guess, what I'm trying to ask is: Is the 410 2.0 worth the purchase if I already have an sct 410.3 (I have pretty much most Tekno Upgrades on it)? Does it handle better? Is it just as durable as it's older brother? Anyone willing to give me a break down, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks.
Last edited: